Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Jocktalk - Should Calgary Bid?



The Newsy Neighbour Magazine
April Issue 114
Article Provided By: Jock Wilson of JockTalk


NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman strutted through Southern Alberta last month and insulted Calgarians saying the Saddledome is an "antiquated, inefficient building" that "doesn't hold a candle to new arena's like Edmonton's Rogers Place." The New York lawyer proclaimed Calgary needs a new arena "yesterday."

Comments like this is why I try to avoid the commissioner like the plague. Bettman doesn't speak for Calgarians or Albertans, he speaks for 31 wealthy NHL owners. A Calgary owner (Murray Edwards) who doesn't even live in the city anymore.

Is the NHL going to pay for the new building, Gary? How about you, Mr. Edwards?

It was very clear from callers to my radio show that a new downtown Entertainment Center would be a welcome addition, however the majority do not want tax dollars to pay it. Calgary Mayor Naheed Neshi took it one step further.

“It’s both vital and important according to Mr. Bettman,” Nenshi said. “You know, we have many things that are vitally important. We are in an economic downturn; a lot of people don’t know where their next meal is coming from. I’ve got a lot of priorities to work with. Public money must be spent for public benefit.”

The arena debate highlights even a bigger issue that could soon be facing Calgary and Southern Alberta. Should Calgary bid on the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games? The Calgary Bid Exploration Committee is currently working on a master plan that it will present to the city in July. The mandate of the committee is to evaluate whether an Olympic bid is feasible, prudent or even realistic.

The 2026 Calgary Olympic Master Plan must have transparency and detail a lasting legacy for our venues, economic opportunity, sport development, social development and cultural enrichment. Obviously, this will come with a huge price tag!

VANOC president John Furlong tried to spin a balanced budget for the 2010 Games in Vancouver and Whistler. Maybe this was the case if you don't include the 2.1 billion dollars spent on the sky train from the airport to downtown, 2 billion on the sea to sky highway to Whistler, 883 million on the convention center, 663 million on the False Creek athletes’ village and almost 1 billion on security. In most cases (everything except security) this was money well spent with a lasting legacy for Vancouver and Whistler.

If Calgary does move forward with a 2026 bid, do we do it on the cheap? Or do we do it with a vision for a lasting legacy? This comes with a cost!

Who wouldn't want to see a train from the airport to downtown? You know our mayor would love to speed up construction of the green line LRT and a new athletes’ village would double down as affordable low cost housing after the games. Sooner or later, there will be a new arena project on the table, we may as well do this in conjunction with an Olympic bid. We also have aging Olympic facilities and if we want our legacy to continue as a leader in winter sport development, these facilities are going to need major upgrades. Either that or we are going to have to shut them down.

In my opinion, there are three key threats when it comes to hosting the 2026 games.

1. Will our National Park be receptive to hosting the Alpine events at the Lake Louise Ski Resort? While Nakiska can be used for ski cross, boarder cross events and maybe slalom events, Mount Allen was a terrible choice and a huge waste of money for the alpine events in 1988. If the Park says no, then we may as well stop discussion right now.

2. Are we really going to spend millions on a temporary Ski Jump facility? The Canmore Nordic Center is still a world class facility for Biathlon and Cross Country events but the jumps at Winsport are obsolete. There are lots of rumours on where this temporary facility would be built including the hill on the SAIT campus.

3. Security Costs. While former police chief Rick Hanson may have a few ideas on how to save in this department, this will be a huge number that will be tough to stomach. Speculation says the cost could close in on 1 billion dollars. Costs like this are why most democratic countries are steering clear of the Games. Countries like Russia, Korea and China don't have to be accountable to their tax payers. I did have a great suggestion from one of my listeners on Sportstalk on Newstalk 770. Why not pass some the security costs on to all competing nations? The host nation would pay the biggest tab but some costs could be shared by competing countries.

While most of our venues will be re-purposed for a 2026 bid, we will need a new hockey arena, athletes’ village in Calgary and Lake Louise, a broadcast center and major upgrades on the Olympic Oval and the Sliding Center.

Could a 5-billion-dollar price tag be just the starting point? Will all 3 levels of government be on side? There is a reason why countries like Norway, Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, France and Poland have all backed away from potential bids.

Russia in 2014, Korea in 2018, Beijing in 2022. Does the IOC really want to go to Kazakhstan for 2026? I think not, but there may not be any other options. The costs of hosting an Olympics is getting out of hand.

If you haven't done so already, I urge you check out the website shouldcalgarybid.com. Have your say and fill out the questionnaire.

Personally, I would love to see Calgary host the 2026 Olympics. I also understand it has to make economic sense.



About Jock Wilson:
Jock has been involved in the Calgary sport media scene for over 30 years. He hosts the Calgary Stampeder football broadcasts on Newstalk 770 and is the host of Sportstalk from 6:30 pm to 8:00 pm.

Email: jock@am770chqr.com
Twitter: @sportson770

No comments: