Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Shaken & Stirred: MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT AND PARTISAN POLITICS



The Newsy Neighbbour Magazine
August Issue 118
Article Provided By:Marcy Field 


On August 1, 2017 seventy-five days remain until the municipal elections take place in Alberta. One of the unique characteristics of these elections is the absence of partisan politics. It appears this absence contributes to another anomaly, the likelihood of incumbents winning repeated re-elections. A current area councillor recently brought this to my attention. We discussed how few new ideas emerge with the same group of people around the table.
A recent article by The University of Calgary School of Public Policy (March 2017) provides support regarding re-elections. It states a candidate's character and length of experience take on a larger priority in the voting decision. As long as citizens remain largely unperturbed by the overall actions of council, the risk of replacing them at election time may be seen as unnecessary risk. People chose to maintain the status quo.

Holding Government Accountable
Elections provide voters the opportunity to hold governments accountable for policies and actions. Historically, low levels of participation are experienced during municipal elections. Voters receive limited information on candidates' positions or council actions. I believe over the last 30 years, I didn't vote in at least 50% of municipal elections as the district councillor was acclaimed because they were the only person stepping forward. 

Globally, public dissatisfaction with the status quo has led with evolving technology are changing the political environment. The return of populist philosophy in Europe and the United States is evident. This caustic attitude is creeping into both provincial and federal politics.

It is important for all levels of government to work together. They support the same population base at differing levels. The unique non-partisan nature of municipal politics creates an environment for councillors to work collaborate to maintain balance and stability. This serves the population much better than the fiery vitriol rampantly emerging both provincially and federally from partisan platforms.

Is government to serve the people or to serve political parties allowing them to continue to form policy and increase the size of their coffers?

Differing Local Approaches
Strathmore Town Council recently voted to send Mayor Michael Ell to Edmonton to support a proposal by MLA Derek Fildebrandt to the Alberta Electoral Boundaries Commission. Councillor Denise Peterson opposed this motion stating; "I certainly have no problem with you going, Mayor, on your own hook but I enter into municipal politics because I believe it is a non-partisan activity and it's one of the reasons why I so fervently appreciate municipal politics and why I'm here."
Wheatland County Council motioned to send a letter to the Commission stating they have "no strong issues with the boundaries as proposed by the commission as (their) main concern is maintaining the county as a whole under one MLA. But if MLA Fildebrandt’s submission makes sense to the commission, then (Wheatland County) would gladly remain as Strathmore-Brooks in one electoral commission as it does seem to meet the objections of the commission in population and area." 

Of course, the size of the proposed Drumheller-Strathmore constituency may present a problem for effective engagement with area residents for an MLA. However, this is something already being experienced by residents within the current constituency. Is Fildebrandt's primary focus representing his constituents' concerns or partisan politics?

Speaking for Albertans
Finally, I'm tired of politicians claiming to be speaking for Albertans. Please note: I am an Albertan. The majority of things currently bantered about does not represent my opinions and, likely, others. I don't want Trump politics in my province. I'm supportive of candidates who show a genuine interest in their constituents serving their best interests. Elected officials showing genuine interest in those within their electoral districts is a game changer. It is important for them to listen and not assume they are speaking on behalf of everyone. Take note of the silent majority. They're full of surprises.

No comments: